You will notice if you look at the suggested outline paper that I provided that you need to have some context around the results that you present period I feel like this paper is mostly just the results.

You are not just doing a report on an analysis, but you are doing a report to a client. Because of that, you need to have some things to make the document friendly for the client to understand. They need to know what questions you are asking, why those questions are important, and how you got the information. These questions should be both a general research question or business question, and then specific questions that you looked at answering. The general question would be what causes tweets about games to get engagement the specific questions would be about tweets with images tweets with luck, etc. Then you can get to the results.

You need to write a top line section or what we might call an executive summary. This is going to start with the major question that you were trying to answer in the study. In your case, it seems like it is a question of whether luck or difficulty gets more engagement when discussing social media games. You then have a very brief discussion of the method that you used. This you kind of have in your first paragraph. And then you need a quick summary of the most important findings. This will be two or three sentences that describe what you found related to that overall question. This is a rather short section, perhaps two paragraphs.

You should have a heading that says methods. Your method section is pretty much what you have in your first paragraph, and I am confused by it. When you use passive voice by saying things like 10 tweets were picked from each week, or when you use statements like 40 popular tweets on word L, I have no idea how you determined what popular is or how you picked those 10 tweets. I don't know what you mean by a proclivity for positive or negative sentiments. I feel like you need to say more about why you included the data that you did. You also need to say how the data was collected. This needs to be specific saying exactly what it was that you did. I do not understand your methodology for calculating sentiment. How did you determine if words were positive or negative?

You should have a heading that says results. Your tables need legends. These legends should explain what is found in the table. For example, it might say four tweets with images table one tweets with images got fewer likes but more retweets and replies. Following each table, you need to comment on what is seen in the table. You cannot assume that your client is smart enough to draw conclusions from just a raw presentation of the data like this they are engaging you in order for you to bring insight do those findings period that means you need to write something under the tables that has those insights. As you specify the research questions at the beginning comma you should have those same questions included in that results section.

Now, for some general writing comments. You need to make sure not to overstate what you can learn from the data you have period for example you say under “interactions reference to luck” that most users choose to remain impartial on their stand. You don't know if they're partial or impartial. You only know if they engaged or not. Within the text when you are referring to the cases themselves for example hard or luck, I would show that those are special words by putting them in quotation marks.

It does not make sense to me that you reported the sentiment week by week, and also reported a joint bar graph. Just like 4 tables, any visualizations need to have a title, and they also need to have explanatory text afterwards period. If you are going to summarize all of them comma and that chart is not too complicated comma you just need the summary chart period if that final chart is too complicated, then you don't need to have it at all.

When it comes to citing your work, you do not need to link to tweets. If the content of the tweets is important, put the content of the tweets. It is too much to ask for the audience to go in and type all of those links in to see what the tweets say. Other links, I am not sure why they are there. You should not have links or references in a document if you are not showing in the text where you are using them. This does not mean you can have a paper that has no references in it, but it does mean that you need to add them back in the document in the appropriate place.

You can say much more about the importance of your work. If someone wants to create a game, what are the pros and cons of having a sharing feature? Should they have pre filled text that refers to luck or difficulty? For someone who was interested in the results of this study because I want to build something like wordle, what can I learn from what you have done? This should be the end of your paper.