Tuana claims that ignorance is far more complex an issue than something we simply do not yet know. Briefly explain the claim and Tuana’s reasoning in support of this claim. Then critically assess Tuana’s argument: Do you agree with Tuana?
850-950 words long
Structure:
- Begin with a brief introduction to the topic of the paper. Write one or two sentences that summarize the topic and explain its importance. Then state your own position in one or two sentences.
- Your initial statement of your position can be controversial or humorous.
- Try to grab your reader’s attention.
- Briefly explain the philosopher’s claim and their reasoning in support of that claim.
- Argue for your position. Support your position with one long argument or two short arguments.
- Outline your argument on the argumentation worksheet before you begin writing your draft.
- Use examples or analogies to support your position.
- Use empirical evidence, if applicable.
- Your argument should be persuasive and
- Engage with an alternative position. A very common way to do this is to present a counter-argument, and tell your reader how you would respond to it. Another strategy for engaging with alternatives is to articulate a question about your position that challenges you to dig deeper in some way, and tell your reader how you would respond to it. Engaging with “the other side” makes your reasoning more well-considered and more persuasive.
