+1 (229) 255-3712
glass
pen
clip
papers
heaphones

  

Please help me write this Tax Memo. It is supposed to be based off of this client below. Let me know if there are any questions and need me to specify anything. I will attach two examples of how tax memos are done. Please use the same FORMAT as it is very important.

Background:

Your client, Jimmy Smith (“Smith”), Amelia Wang (“Wang”) and Sammy Cortez (“Cortez”) formed a partnership to provide advertising services in 2019 and called the partnership Smith Wang Cortez Icons (“SWCI”). Jimmy and Amelia provide services to the partnership for their share of the partnership (35% each) and Sammy provided cash of $200,000 for his 30% interest. In 2019 and 2020 Jimmy and Amelia received guaranteed payments of $350,000 each in 2019 and $40,000 each in 2020. The partnership made a loss of $6500,000 in 2019 and a loss of $1 million in 2020. The losses were allocated to each of the partners in accordance with their percentage ownership interests in SWCI, i.e. Smith was allocated 35% of the losses, Wang was allocated 35% of the losses and Cortez was allocated 30% of the losses.

Due to the continual losses experienced by SWCI Cortez had to continue to inject funds into the partnership to keep it afloat. After the initial cash of $200,000 by Cortez in 2019, he injected further funds in 2019 of $500,000 and in 2020 two additional amounts of $400,000 and $600,000 and in 2021 an amount of $10,000. The funds injected in 2019 ($700,000) and 2020 ($1 million) were recorded as loans from Cortez to SWCI and reflected on the balance sheet and on the tax return as amount due to partner. The debt was recourse debt and reflected as allocated to the three partners in the same percentages as the loss allocations for the partners.

Smith included the guaranteed payment of $350,000 and loss from the partnership of $227,500 on Form 1040 for the 2019 tax year and included the guaranteed payment of $400,000 and loss from the partnership of $350,000 on Form 1040 for the 2020 tax year. Wang included the same information on her Form 1040 for 2019 and 2020.

The capital accounts for all three partners showed 0 as the initial contribution for 2019, i.e. none of them had any initial contribution recorded, and the losses allocated to them resulted in negative capital accounts. The capital accounts for the three partners at the end of 2020 also reflected negative capital accounts that had been increased by the amount of the losses allocated to them in 2020.

In 2021, SWCI ceased operations and had neither a profit or a loss. SWCI would now like to reclassify the debt due to Cortez as a capital contribution by Cortez and file a final federal return for the partnership as the partnership has terminated.

You can safely assume that there was a signed partnership agreement and there were terms specified for what needs to occur for an item to be considered a contribution to capital.

SWCI needs advice for the following for the 2021 income tax year:

  1. Is it possible in 2021 to reclassify the debt due to the partner Cortez as capital contributions from the partner Cortez?
  2. Is there any income that should be realized and recognized for the partnership in 2021?
  3. What gain or loss will the partner Smith realize and recognize on the termination of the partnership, including the character of that gain or loss?

You research should consider the following (but it is not an exhaustive list):

-Hohl et al. v Commissioner (T.C. Memo 2021-5)

-IRC §61(a)(12)

Your responsibility:

Prepare a tax research memo addressing the question that has been raised. Please note that if the tax memo is not in the required format and/or contains very little analysis you will receive a zero (0) for the assignment. All good faith efforts are capable of receiving a minimum of 60% but less than a good faith effort will be awarded zero points.

You will need to support your conclusion using primary sources of tax law. Your textbook is NOT primary authority nor are IRS Publications. Please refer to Chapter 2 for primary authorities. CCH AnswerConnect is not a primary authority, nor is Google Scholar nor are any other websites you may access. The primary authorities are legislative, administrative and judicial.

You must use proper citation form in your memo (see Chapter 2 for help with citation form). The form for this communication should be professional and in the form of a tax research memo (examples posted on Canvas and a similar example in your textbook). You will see that citations are within the text of the document in the example. Once a court case has been cited in full, it can be referred to using simply the name in italics.

Do yourself a favor and look at the grading rubric before you submit.

This memo should be whatever length you feel is appropriate to resolve the issues. We do NOT use a bibliography or list of references in a tax research memo. We do not include Background in a tax memo. The Background is provided so you can identify the facts.

Aspects of the memo Points
Content – facts and issue(s) 16
Content – analysis 30
Content – conclusion 14
Organization 8
Audience 8
Style 8
Mechanics 8
Referencing 8
Total 100

Tax memo rubric

Criteria Ratings Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent – Facts and issuesAll pertinent facts and issues have been described in a clear and concise manner. Distinguishing features of the fact pattern are highlighted.

16 pts

Full Marks

14 pts

Good

13 pts

Fair

Most critical facts and issues identified and communicated. Some unessential facts included.

11 pts

Needs work

10 pts

Poor

Critical facts and issues omitted or substantial unessential facts and issues included. Unable to apply or distinguish from other possible fact patterns or facts are merely copied from case.

0 pts

Little or no effort

Does not meet minimum requirements for effort

16 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent – AnalysisAll necessary references to authority have been made. Authority which could apply but does not has been distinguished from that which does. The analysis follows a logical pattern of application to the facts and supports author’s conclusion.

30 pts

Full Marks

All necessary references to authority have been made. Authority which could apply but does not has been distinguished from that which does. The analysis follows a logical pattern of application to the facts and supports author’s conclusion.

27 pts

Good

24 pts

Fair

Analysis is incomplete or one-sided. Most relevant authority has been identified. Analysis is not perfectly logical or does not support issue stated.

21 pts

Needs work

18 pts

Poor

Analysis is deficient in reference to authoritative tax law. Analysis lacks cohesion and does not support conclusion. Analysis relies on secondary sources when primary sources exist.

0 pts

Little or no effort

Does not meet minimum requirements for effort

30 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent – ConclusionConclusion is clear and integrates with facts and analysis. More than a simple sentence stating conclusion. Cause and effect relationship between facts and analysis are made. All open issues are responded to. Conclusion drawn is correct.

14 pts

Full Marks

13 pts

Good

11 pts

Fair

Conclusion fails to tie analysis and facts together. Some conclusions made as part of analysis instead of in conclusion.

10 pts

Needs work

8 pts

Poor

Conclusion is unclear and unsupported by analysis. Reader is not able to form educated opinion on tax treatment of facts pattern. Conclusion is a simple sentence stating conclusion.

0 pts

Little or no effort

Does not meet minimum requirements for effort

14 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeOrganizationPaper flows well with appropriate beginning, development, and conclusion. Paragraph structure contributes to flow and transitions. Organization and/or headings help the reader to understand and remember information.

8 pts

Full Marks

Paper flows well with appropriate beginning, development, and conclusion. Paragraph structure contributes to flow and transitions. Organization and/or headings help the reader to understand and remember information.

7 pts

Good

6 pts

Fair

Paper follows logical sequence with identifiable beginning, development, and conclusion. Generally proper use of paragraph structure and topic sentences. Organization and/or headings help the reader to follow and find information.

5 pts

Needs work

4 pts

Poor

Paper lacks logical sequence hence causing format to interfere with readability. Does not use proper paragraphing. Topic sentences do not lead to rest of paragraph or are missing altogether.

0 pts

Little or no effort

Does not meet minimum requirements for effort

8 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAudienceWriter clearly focuses writing to the audience, and displays empathy for the reader. Goodwill is created through consideration of the reader’s needs. Message tailored directly for the reader

8 pts

Full Marks

Writer clearly focuses writing to the audience, and displays empathy for the reader. Goodwill is created through consideration of the reader’s needs. Message tailored directly for the reader

7 pts

Good

6 pts

Fair

Writer acknowledges the reader and displays some thought about the nature of the audience. Reader is treated politely and positively. No evidence of inappropriate attitude.

5 pts

Needs work

4 pts

Poor

Writer is internally focused rather than focused on the reader. No clear awareness or understanding of the audience is evident. Writer may appear discourteous to the reader.

0 pts

Little or no effort

Does not meet minimum requirements for effort

8 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeStyleDemonstrates a sophisticated grasp of the language in terms of both sentence structure and vocabulary. Writes fluidly and concisely. Includes appropriate business terms.

8 pts

Full Marks

Demonstrates a sophisticated grasp of the language in terms of both sentence structure and vocabulary. Writes fluidly and concisely. Includes appropriate business terms.

7 pts

Good

6 pts

Fair

Sentences vary in length and style. Strong action verbs are used. Occasionally uses jargon or clichés. Vocabulary and word usage generally is correct and shows some variety. Uses business terms appropriately.

5 pts

Needs work

4 pts

Poor

Overuse of simple sentences. May misuse words or idioms. May include slang. Wordy rather than concise. Writing shows lack of sophistication or variety in vocabulary. Awkward. Little or no use of business terms.

0 pts

Little or no effort

Does not meet minimum requirements for effort

8 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeMechanicsNo errors in word usage, sentence structure (run-ons, fragments), spelling, punctuation, and capitalization. Strong mechanics help to establish credibility.

8 pts

Full Marks

No errors in word usage, sentence structure (run-ons, fragments), spelling, punctuation, and capitalization. Strong mechanics help to establish credibility.

7 pts

Good

6 pts

Fair

Relatively free of errors in word usage, sentence structure (run-ons, fragments), spelling, punctuation, and capitalization. Mechanics do not detract from credibility of the content.

5 pts

Needs work

4 pts

Poor

Significant errors in word usage, sentence structure (run-ons, fragments), spelling, punctuation, and capitalization. Errors undermine credibility of content and readability.

0 pts

Little or no effort

Does not meet minimum requirements for effort

8 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeReferencingReferences (if called for) are consistently correct. No missing citations.

8 pts

Full Marks

References (if called for) are consistently correct. No missing citations.

7 pts

Good

6 pts

Fair

Generally correct referencing (if called for).

5 pts

Needs work

4 pts

Poor

References (if called for) are missing or do not use correct referencing style.

0 pts

Little or no effort

Does not meet minimum requirements for effort

8 pts

Total Points: 100